OpenZync
Menu
BACK TO USE CASESDEVOPS — USE CASE

DevOps Incident Response with Infrastructure Memory

An AI ops assistant that remembers past incidents, runbooks, resolution steps, and infrastructure context — accelerating troubleshooting and reducing MTTR.

OVERVIEW

The situation.

Context before architecture.

Incident response teams operate in high-pressure environments where every minute counts. Stateless AI ops assistants can read logs and suggest fixes, but they cannot remember that a similar outage happened three months ago, what the root cause was, or which runbook resolved it. OpenZync provides persistent graph-based memory that gives ops AI assistants a complete understanding of incident history, infrastructure relationships, and resolution patterns.

CHALLENGE

The problem.

DevOps teams manage complex, interconnected systems with hundreds of services, databases, and infrastructure components. When an incident occurs, responders must navigate through multiple monitoring tools, log systems, and runbook repositories to piece together what's happening. AI assistants can help, but without memory they treat each incident as unprecedented — even when the exact same error pattern occurred weeks earlier. They cannot answer questions like 'Has this error happened before?' or 'What did we change right before the last PagerDuty alert on this service?' without manual context provision from the engineer. This dramatically limits the AI's value during the most critical moments.

SOLUTION

How OpenZync addresses it.

OpenZync serves as the persistent memory and relationship graph for DevOps AI assistants. The infrastructure and its incident history are modelled as a knowledge graph that tracks:

- Services, deployments, and infrastructure components with dependency relationships - Incident records with timestamps, severity, root cause, duration, and resolution steps - Runbooks and playbooks linked to the specific incident types they address - Change history — deployments, config changes, scaling events — connected to services they affected - Alert patterns and their correlation with past incidents

When an incident is detected, the AI assistant queries OpenZync for contextual intelligence: similar past incidents, their root causes and resolutions, recent changes to the affected service, and the most relevant runbook. As the incident response unfolds, each action — command run, dashboard consulted, escalation made — is logged back into the knowledge graph, building a living post-mortem.

The assistant can proactively suggest: 'This error signature matches the memory leak incident from April. The fix was a connection pool configuration change in service X. Here's the PR that resolved it.'

ARCHITECTURE

Technical architecture.

OpenZync integrates with existing observability and incident management tools — PagerDuty, DataDog, Prometheus, Grafana — via webhook and API connectors. An event ingestion pipeline captures alerts, deployment events, and incident lifecycle changes in real time.

The graph backend uses PostgreSQL with pgvector, chosen to remain within existing infrastructure. Historical incident data is backfilled from tools like Opsgenie or linear to populate the knowledge graph with institutional memory that outlasts any single team member.

OUTCOME

What you get.

The durable result of running this scenario on the memory layer.

01

Persistent incident memory prevents teams from solving the same problem twice by surfacing past resolutions automatically.

02

Graph-based dependency mapping helps AI assistants understand blast radius and cascading failure patterns.

03

Every incident enriches the knowledge graph, creating an ever-improving institutional memory that survives team turnover.

07 — ACCESS

Build this scenario on your own infrastructure.

Set up in minutes, not days. Docs, the SDK, and the MCP server ship alongside the core.

08 DEPLOY

Run the memory layer on your own infrastructure.

Start free on the hosted instance, or self-host the AGPLv3 core in your own VPC. No credit card, no sales call.